A Quirky Crime Drama That Falls Short of Its Ambitious Concept

A Quirky Crime Drama That Falls Short of Its Ambitious Concept

Three young friends from a small village dream of doing something extraordinary with their lives. One wants to become a filmmaker, another dreams of becoming a cricketer, while the third has his own obsession and ambitions. Their ordinary lives take an unexpected turn when they become involved in a much bigger situation involving crime, trafficking and an investigative journalist. What starts as a simple adventure gradually connects them to a dangerous mission that is far beyond what children of their age would normally be expected to handle. code : 38

The film attempts to combine childhood innocence, friendship, comedy, crime and adventure into one unusual story. Its biggest strength is undoubtedly the decision to place three children at the centre of the narrative instead of following the conventional hero-driven formula. The concept is interesting on paper, and there are several moments where the performances of the young actors make the film engaging. However, inconsistent writing, logical loopholes, an excessive reliance on suspension of disbelief and a slow-moving screenplay prevent it from becoming the exciting adventure thriller it could have been.

Mishan Impossible Movie Details

Category	Details
Movie Name	Mishan Impossible
Release Year	2022
Genre	Crime, Drama, Comedy, Adventure
Language	Telugu
Lead Cast	Taapsee Pannu, Harsh Roshan, Bhannu Prakash
Director	Swaroop RSJ
Cinematography	Deepak Yeragera
Music	Mark K. Robin
OTT Platform	Netflix
Audio	Telugu
Subtitles	English
Runtime	Around 2 Hours
Age Rating	U/A 13+
Type	Children’s Adventure Crime Drama
Movie Link	Click Here
Rating	2.5/5

Mishan Impossible Story

The story revolves around three young boys who live in a village and share a close friendship.

They are not portrayed as typical movie heroes.

Instead, each child has his own dreams, interests and personality.

One of them is fascinated by movies and dreams of becoming a filmmaker. Another is passionate about cricket and wants to make a name for himself. The third friend also has his own unique obsession.

The film spends time introducing these children and their world before bringing them into the central conflict.

This is actually one of the more interesting aspects of the movie.

Instead of immediately introducing a hero, villain and conventional mission, the director takes time to establish the lives of the three boys.

Their friendship becomes an important part of the narrative.

At the same time, another storyline is developing.

An investigative journalist played by Taapsee Pannu is working on a major trafficking case. She is trying to collect evidence and expose the people responsible.

Her investigation eventually connects with the lives of the three children.

The boys, who initially have no idea about the scale of the situation they are getting involved in, find themselves facing a much bigger challenge.

The central concept is unusual because the story puts children in the middle of a crime-related mission.

This is where the movie tries to differentiate itself from conventional Telugu cinema.

There is no typical hero introduction, no standard romantic track and no regular commercial formula.

Instead, the film tries to present an adventure involving three children.

That idea itself is refreshing.

However, the story requires the audience to accept a very large amount of improbability.

The children become involved in situations that normally require experienced adults, investigators or law-enforcement personnel.

This is where the movie starts losing some credibility.

The Biggest Strength: The Three Children

The three young actors are easily among the best parts of the movie.

Their friendship and chemistry provide the film with much of its charm.

Their conversations, arguments and playful moments feel more natural than some of the scripted comedy elsewhere in the movie.

The performances are particularly impressive considering the amount of responsibility placed on the young actors.

Harsh Roshan, in particular, makes a strong impression.

His expressions, body language and comic timing give the character personality.

There are moments where he behaves like an experienced performer rather than someone carrying a relatively demanding role at such a young age.

The three boys also have distinct personalities.

That helps prevent them from feeling like interchangeable characters.

Each one has his own dreams and motivations, and their friendship is central to the story.

The movie works best when it simply allows these characters to interact naturally.

Their innocent approach to situations creates some entertaining moments.

Friendship Works Better Than the Crime Plot

Interestingly, the friendship portions are often more engaging than the actual crime storyline.

The three boys have an uncomplicated relationship.

They argue, joke around and support each other.

These scenes provide the emotional foundation of the film.

Whenever the story focuses on their friendship, the movie feels lighter and more enjoyable.

The problem comes when the screenplay asks us to take their larger mission extremely seriously.

The contrast becomes noticeable.

The children are written in a way that sometimes makes them look extremely innocent and inexperienced.

At other times, the screenplay expects them to behave like highly intelligent investigators.

This inconsistency affects the believability of the story.

The Biggest Problem: Logic

The largest weakness of the movie is its internal logic.

The premise itself requires some suspension of disbelief.

That is not necessarily a problem.

Movies can be fantastical and still work.

The issue here is that the film does not always maintain consistency regarding what the children are capable of doing.

At certain points, they struggle with basic things.

At other points, they suddenly demonstrate skills and problem-solving abilities that seem far beyond their age.

This creates an uneven experience.

The audience starts wondering whether the characters are actually supposed to be ordinary children or highly capable young detectives.

A movie can ask viewers to believe something extraordinary.

But it still needs to establish rules within its own world.

Mishan Impossible occasionally breaks those rules for the convenience of the screenplay.

That makes some situations difficult to take seriously.

Suspension of Disbelief

The film asks the audience to accept several improbable developments.

The central idea is already unusual.

Three children getting involved in a major criminal situation is something that requires the viewer to accept a certain level of fantasy.

That could have worked if the screenplay had fully embraced the adventurous nature of the premise.

Instead, the movie sometimes treats the situation realistically and sometimes approaches it like a children’s fantasy adventure.

Because of this tonal imbalance, the audience may not always know how seriously to take the events.

The movie would have worked better if the writers had clearly established the kind of world they wanted to create.

Screenplay Review

The screenplay is another mixed aspect.

The director has an interesting concept, but the execution takes too long to become engaging.

The opening portions are primarily dedicated to introducing the characters and their environment.

There is nothing inherently wrong with taking time to establish the protagonists.

In fact, character development can make the later portions more effective.

However, the central plot takes a while to properly take off.

The pacing becomes an issue because the audience is waiting for the promised adventure to begin.

Once the main conflict starts, the movie becomes more interesting.

But even then, the screenplay does not consistently maintain momentum.

Some scenes are entertaining, while others feel stretched.

Comedy

The movie contains several comedy scenes, especially involving the three boys.

Some of these jokes work because they emerge naturally from the characters.

The boys’ conversations and reactions can be genuinely amusing.

However, not every joke lands.

There are moments where the comedy feels predictable.

Some jokes are also explained more than necessary.

Comedy generally works best when the audience is allowed to understand the joke without the film underlining it.

Here, certain sequences feel like they are written specifically for younger viewers.

That is not necessarily a negative, considering the film’s central characters.

But it can make the humour less effective for adult viewers.

Taapsee Pannu’s Role

Taapsee Pannu plays an investigative journalist who is involved in the trafficking storyline.

Her character provides the movie with a more serious crime-drama angle.

The contrast between her investigation and the children’s adventure is an interesting idea.

However, her storyline does not always feel as strong as the children’s portions.

The character has an important role in the plot, but the screenplay does not give her enough material to become the dominant force of the narrative.

Taapsee performs the role sincerely.

Her presence adds credibility to the serious portions.

However, the writing around her character could have been stronger.

The investigative track needed more depth and tension to balance the lighter children’s storyline.

Character Writing

The movie deserves some credit for attempting to give the children individual personalities.

They are not simply three generic kids.

Their dreams and interests help define them.

That makes their friendship more believable.

However, the writing becomes inconsistent when the plot requires them to perform actions beyond their established abilities.

This is where the character development and plot requirements clash.

The audience understands that they are children.

But the story occasionally treats them like adults.

That contradiction becomes one of the central problems with the narrative.

Pacing Issues

The pacing is not terrible throughout, but the film certainly could have been tighter.

The initial setup takes time.

The central mission takes time to become interesting.

Some scenes could have been shortened without damaging the main story.

The best portions are generally the ones where the story is moving forward or where the three children are interacting.

Whenever the film slows down to explain the plot, the momentum decreases.

A sharper edit could have improved the overall viewing experience considerably.

Direction

Swaroop RSJ deserves credit for attempting something different.

The director does not simply follow a standard commercial formula.

The decision to make children the central characters of a crime-adventure story is ambitious.

The film also attempts to maintain a balance between comedy, drama and crime.

The direction works best in the smaller character moments.

The friendship between the children is presented with warmth.

The larger crime plot, however, does not always receive the same level of control.

The director’s ambition is visible, but the screenplay does not always support that ambition.

Cinematography

The cinematography is one of the technically stronger aspects.

Deepak’s frames give the film a polished visual appearance.

The village settings and outdoor locations are captured nicely.

The camera work also helps create a sense of adventure around the children’s journey.

The visual quality is noticeably better than what one might expect from a small-scale children’s adventure.

The cinematography adds a cinematic feel to the story even when the screenplay becomes uneven.

Background Score

Mark K. Robin’s background score is energetic.

The music attempts to bring excitement to the adventure portions.

There are scenes where the BGM adds energy and helps create momentum.

However, there is an interesting contrast between the background score and what is actually happening on screen.

At times, the music feels bigger and more energetic than the events themselves.

The score is good from a technical perspective, but the screenplay does not always provide enough material for it to make the desired impact.

Production Quality

The production quality is good.

The film does not look like a cheaply made children’s movie.

The locations, cinematography, sound design and overall presentation are handled professionally.

The technical polish is particularly noticeable because the story itself is unconventional.

There are enough visual details to make the movie look appealing.

The problem is not the production value.

The problem is whether the story consistently uses that production value effectively.

Does the Film Feel Like a Children’s Movie?

In some ways, yes.

The central characters are children.

The humour is often designed around their innocence.

The adventure elements also give the movie a family-friendly quality.

However, the crime and trafficking storyline introduces darker material.

This creates an unusual combination.

The movie is not purely a children’s comedy.

It is also not a completely serious crime thriller.

It exists somewhere between the two.

For viewers who enjoy this type of genre mix, that can be appealing.

For others, the tonal shifts may feel inconsistent.

What Works in Mishan Impossible?

Positive Aspect	Review
Three Young Actors	Strong and natural performances
Friendship	One of the most engaging elements
Basic Concept	Fresh and unusual
Cinematography	Visually polished
Background Score	Energetic and effective
Character Introductions	Gives the children individual identities
Direction	Attempts something different
Production Quality	Good technical presentation
Female Lead	Taapsee adds seriousness to the crime track

What Does Not Work?

Negative Aspect	Review
Screenplay	Takes too long to become engaging
Logic	Several situations require excessive disbelief
Character Consistency	Children behave differently depending on the scene
Comedy	Some jokes feel predictable
Pacing	Several portions feel stretched
Crime Track	Does not always create enough tension
Taapsee’s Track	Could have been better developed
Suspense	Not consistently maintained
Overall Execution	Concept is stronger than the final result

Is Mishan Impossible Worth Watching?

The answer depends on what you expect.

If you are looking for a serious crime thriller with realistic investigative elements, this may not be the right choice.

The film requires a considerable amount of suspension of disbelief.

If you are looking for a light adventure involving three children, friendship and some crime elements, then it is worth trying.

The performances of the young actors are a major reason to watch it.

Their chemistry and energy keep several scenes enjoyable.

The cinematography and background score also contribute positively.

However, the movie is not consistently engaging.

There are portions where the story feels slow.

There are also logical inconsistencies that can make it difficult to take the central mission seriously.

OTT Availability

The movie is available on Netflix.

The OTT format suits the film reasonably well because it allows viewers to watch it at their own pace.

If you enjoy Telugu movies with unusual concepts, children’s adventures and crime-comedy elements, you can give it a chance.

It is not a must-watch film, but it can work as a one-time viewing experience.

Overall, Mishan Impossible is an ambitious attempt to tell a crime-adventure story through the eyes of three children.

The concept deserves appreciation because it moves away from the usual hero-centric Telugu commercial formula.

The three young actors are the biggest strength of the movie.

Their friendship, banter and performances provide some of the most enjoyable moments.

Harsh Roshan, in particular, stands out with a surprisingly mature performance.

Taapsee Pannu also adds credibility to the investigative journalist track, although her character could have been written with more depth.

Technically, the movie is polished.

The cinematography is good, the background score is energetic and the overall production quality is impressive.

Unfortunately, the screenplay does not consistently match the ambition of the concept.

The biggest issue is the logic.

The movie expects us to believe that three children can become involved in an extremely serious criminal mission, but it does not always maintain consistency in their intelligence and abilities.

At certain points, they appear inexperienced children, while at other points they behave like professional investigators.

The comedy also works only intermittently.

Some jokes are natural and entertaining, while others feel predictable or unnecessarily explained.

The pacing is another weakness.

The story takes too long to reach the central conflict, and even after the conflict begins, the screenplay occasionally loses momentum.

The crime storyline could have been much more intense if it had been written with greater urgency.

The concept is definitely more interesting than the final execution.

That is probably the best way to describe the film.

It is not a complete failure.

There are enough good performances, interesting ideas and technically strong elements to make it watchable.

But it also falls short of becoming the exciting adventure thriller that its premise promises.

For viewers who enjoy unconventional Telugu cinema, children’s stories and quirky crime dramas, it can be given a chance.

For viewers expecting a highly realistic investigation thriller, it may be disappointing.

Final Rating: 2.5/5

Verdict: A Well-Intentioned and Unusual Concept Let Down by Logic Issues and Uneven Screenplay

OTT: Netflix